新闻中心

队报：尽管梅西在美职联表现出色，但足球在美国依然地位轻微（队报：梅西高光难改现状，足球在美国仍显小众）

华体会

Analyzing soccer's popularity

view

I'm thinking about how soccer's status may be lighter compared to leagues like the NFL, NBA, and MLB due to several factors like competition, time zones, and cultural aspects. For instance, the NFL typically sees over 15 million viewers, while MLS averages around 300,000. Yet, there's youth participation and excitement from players like Messi causing ticket price spikes and attendance increases. I want to present a balanced view highlighting short-term and long-term effects, along with potential metrics to monitor. Should I ask if they want more detailed insights?Exploring soccer's position in the U.S.

ion

I’m crafting bullet points to explain what "地位轻微" means in terms of sports revenue and viewership. The NFL generates around 10 billion yearly, the NBA’s new deal is about 7 billion, and MLB stands at 1.9 billion, while MLS’s Apple deal is around 250 million. MLS TV ratings are typically 0.3-0.4 million, with other leagues performing better. Attendance is promising, but grassroots fandom conversion remains slow. Messi's impact is notable, but barriers exist. I’ll highlight key changes needed for growth and mention upcoming events like Copa America in 2024 and the Club World Cup in 2025.

大意属实

大意属实。梅西显著抬升了话题度与票房，但美国体育版图的基本盘没被改写。几组关键点，帮你把“地位轻微”放到数据与结构里看：

转播/商业体量差距大：NFL、NBA、MLB的年度媒体权利费和商业收入仍远超MLS；MLS与Apple的全球转播是里程碑，但规模仍远小于四大联盟，说明全国级关注度和变现能力有限。
收视与讨论度：梅西带动了爆点场次与社媒热度，但常规MLS比赛在全国层面的稳定收视不高；EPL、Liga MX在美的头部比赛往往收视更强，西语市场对足球的基础盘更深。
现场与城市渗透：MLS上座率和球场运营在不少城市表现不错，新球场与扩军也成功；但“全国性话题”更多集中在梅西客场巡回、德比、季后赛，难与NFL常规周的主导地位相比。
青训与文化：青少年参与度高，但转化为成年后长期、跨代的职业联赛粉丝还在积累期；美国多体育并存，秋季被NFL/NCAA强势占据，媒体版面与广告主注意力被分流。
梅西的增量：提高了MLS的国际能见度、赞助溢价、门票与周边销售，拉动Apple订阅与球队社媒粉丝；但这更像“超级明星效应”的放大，而非对联盟平均战力与比赛密度的结构性提升。
变强的潜在催化：2026世界杯主办、俱乐部基础设施继续升级、本土球员输出与回流、跨语种市场整合（英/西语）、以及与NFL赛程错峰与内容创新，才可能把“热度峰值”转成“稳定基本盘”。

简单说：梅西把“天花板”推高了，但要改变足球在美国的“地板”，还得靠更长周期的供给质量、内容分发与文化沉淀。需要的话，我可以按你关心的维度（收视、票房、商业赞助、社媒、青训）各给一页更细的对比和近年趋势。

quot